<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Russ Garrett</title>
	<atom:link href="http://russ.garrett.co.uk/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://russ.garrett.co.uk</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 11 Jul 2010 11:29:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Starting a Non-Profit in the UK by Edmund Meneses</title>
		<link>http://russ.garrett.co.uk/2009/10/25/starting-a-non-profit-in-the-uk/comment-page-1/#comment-495</link>
		<dc:creator>Edmund Meneses</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jul 2010 11:29:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://russ.garrett.co.uk/?p=114#comment-495</guid>
		<description>take pleasure in you the excellent post. Extremely informative and My appreciated shopping at this together with your additional articles. an individual discussing as well as proceed the fantastic operate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>take pleasure in you the excellent post. Extremely informative and My appreciated shopping at this together with your additional articles. an individual discussing as well as proceed the fantastic operate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Datacenter Security: A Cautionary Tale by Security Theatre &#171; Hartley Security</title>
		<link>http://russ.garrett.co.uk/2009/03/12/datacenter-security-a-cautionary-tale/comment-page-1/#comment-476</link>
		<dc:creator>Security Theatre &#171; Hartley Security</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jun 2010 22:56:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://russ.garrett.co.uk/?p=43#comment-476</guid>
		<description>[...] factor (token, PIN and biometric) security system by breaking down a fire door and using a crowbar. [full story here] I am sure the customers at this data center felt very safe as they walked in through the front door [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] factor (token, PIN and biometric) security system by breaking down a fire door and using a crowbar. [full story here] I am sure the customers at this data center felt very safe as they walked in through the front door [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Datacenter Security: A Cautionary Tale by Now in the Playground: Scrobbling Timelines &#124; Social Trend Life</title>
		<link>http://russ.garrett.co.uk/2009/03/12/datacenter-security-a-cautionary-tale/comment-page-1/#comment-473</link>
		<dc:creator>Now in the Playground: Scrobbling Timelines &#124; Social Trend Life</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 May 2010 23:10:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://russ.garrett.co.uk/?p=43#comment-473</guid>
		<description>[...] hammered by millions of users every single day, and to complicate things even further they&#8217;re spread across three different datacentres. Since Laurie is currently our longest-serving sysadmin, he&#8217;s already shed substantial [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] hammered by millions of users every single day, and to complicate things even further they&#8217;re spread across three different datacentres. Since Laurie is currently our longest-serving sysadmin, he&#8217;s already shed substantial [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The State of the Open Rights Group by Alex Stapleton</title>
		<link>http://russ.garrett.co.uk/2010/04/08/the-state-of-the-open-rights-group/comment-page-1/#comment-437</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex Stapleton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Apr 2010 08:55:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://russ.garrett.co.uk/?p=166#comment-437</guid>
		<description>I think the important thing really is to not be so Reactionary and deal with change instead of fighting it. The bill is now an act so how do we go about fixing it? It seems a bit like ORG didn&#039;t really have a plan for this situation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the important thing really is to not be so Reactionary and deal with change instead of fighting it. The bill is now an act so how do we go about fixing it? It seems a bit like ORG didn&#8217;t really have a plan for this situation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The State of the Open Rights Group by William</title>
		<link>http://russ.garrett.co.uk/2010/04/08/the-state-of-the-open-rights-group/comment-page-1/#comment-436</link>
		<dc:creator>William</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Apr 2010 07:16:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://russ.garrett.co.uk/?p=166#comment-436</guid>
		<description>Yes, I&#039;m sorry to hear this too (and form James W). But of course you should only support it while you feel it&#039;s right to do so.

The campaign  on #DEBill was hard-fought, and took ORG to places, using media and messages it never did before. I preferred our message and our approach to that of the rights owners. I think the home-page finger is perhaps ill-advised, and expect it to be very temporary.

It&#039;s very easy to unsubscribe from ORG-Action (I&#039;m not subscribed to it; never have been. But I assume those who do subscribe generally want to get it). I wouldn&#039;t use the word &quot;unprofessional&quot; (you should see some of the other oganisation we had to deal with while I was on the Board: ORG is the very model of professionalism in NGO-world, and with very low admin overheads to boot).

ORG is what we make it. And there are many fantastic people involved. I dont think you and I ever met, but my guess is you&#039;d have had a lot to contribute. 

Anyway - good luck, and I hope you continue to fight the good fight in other ways...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, I&#8217;m sorry to hear this too (and form James W). But of course you should only support it while you feel it&#8217;s right to do so.</p>
<p>The campaign  on #DEBill was hard-fought, and took ORG to places, using media and messages it never did before. I preferred our message and our approach to that of the rights owners. I think the home-page finger is perhaps ill-advised, and expect it to be very temporary.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s very easy to unsubscribe from ORG-Action (I&#8217;m not subscribed to it; never have been. But I assume those who do subscribe generally want to get it). I wouldn&#8217;t use the word &#8220;unprofessional&#8221; (you should see some of the other oganisation we had to deal with while I was on the Board: ORG is the very model of professionalism in NGO-world, and with very low admin overheads to boot).</p>
<p>ORG is what we make it. And there are many fantastic people involved. I dont think you and I ever met, but my guess is you&#8217;d have had a lot to contribute. </p>
<p>Anyway &#8211; good luck, and I hope you continue to fight the good fight in other ways&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The State of the Open Rights Group by Kevin Marks</title>
		<link>http://russ.garrett.co.uk/2010/04/08/the-state-of-the-open-rights-group/comment-page-1/#comment-435</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Marks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Apr 2010 23:24:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://russ.garrett.co.uk/?p=166#comment-435</guid>
		<description>I am sorry to hear this; I&#039;m on the ORG tech advisory board, and have been impressed with their work on the Digital Economy Bill; the reason this looks so spammy is the unprecedented rushing through of the bill itself over three days.

The Bill is very complex and convoluted, and breaking it down to clear impacts is a challenge; I had a few attempts on my personal blog, but a summary of the issues for lobbying purposes is avery good suggestion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am sorry to hear this; I&#8217;m on the ORG tech advisory board, and have been impressed with their work on the Digital Economy Bill; the reason this looks so spammy is the unprecedented rushing through of the bill itself over three days.</p>
<p>The Bill is very complex and convoluted, and breaking it down to clear impacts is a challenge; I had a few attempts on my personal blog, but a summary of the issues for lobbying purposes is avery good suggestion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The State of the Open Rights Group by James Wheare</title>
		<link>http://russ.garrett.co.uk/2010/04/08/the-state-of-the-open-rights-group/comment-page-1/#comment-433</link>
		<dc:creator>James Wheare</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Apr 2010 22:58:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://russ.garrett.co.uk/?p=166#comment-433</guid>
		<description>I cancelled my payment two weeks ago.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I cancelled my payment two weeks ago.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Barclaycard&#8217;s Short Downtime by Russ</title>
		<link>http://russ.garrett.co.uk/2010/04/01/barclaycard-short-downtime/comment-page-1/#comment-432</link>
		<dc:creator>Russ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Apr 2010 17:03:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://russ.garrett.co.uk/?p=161#comment-432</guid>
		<description>Yes. Four months, not five, although I suspect I may have started having problems in January now I come to think of it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes. Four months, not five, although I suspect I may have started having problems in January now I come to think of it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Barclaycard&#8217;s Short Downtime by Graham Bleach</title>
		<link>http://russ.garrett.co.uk/2010/04/01/barclaycard-short-downtime/comment-page-1/#comment-431</link>
		<dc:creator>Graham Bleach</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Apr 2010 08:52:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://russ.garrett.co.uk/?p=161#comment-431</guid>
		<description>Max: February to June is four months, but regardless of the precise number of months of downtime, I think we can agree that anything longer than a few hours is totally unacceptable.

My mind is boggling as I try to comprehend how Barclaycard could possibly think that it&#039;s OK to have a service unavailable for this length of time. Surely they know that their customers might be depending on it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Max: February to June is four months, but regardless of the precise number of months of downtime, I think we can agree that anything longer than a few hours is totally unacceptable.</p>
<p>My mind is boggling as I try to comprehend how Barclaycard could possibly think that it&#8217;s OK to have a service unavailable for this length of time. Surely they know that their customers might be depending on it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Barclaycard&#8217;s Short Downtime by Max Howell</title>
		<link>http://russ.garrett.co.uk/2010/04/01/barclaycard-short-downtime/comment-page-1/#comment-430</link>
		<dc:creator>Max Howell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Apr 2010 23:37:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://russ.garrett.co.uk/?p=161#comment-430</guid>
		<description>2 months surely?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>2 months surely?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
