<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Datacenter Security: A Cautionary Tale</title>
	<atom:link href="http://russ.garrett.co.uk/2009/03/12/datacenter-security-a-cautionary-tale/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://russ.garrett.co.uk/2009/03/12/datacenter-security-a-cautionary-tale/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 11 Jul 2010 11:29:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Security Theatre &#171; Hartley Security</title>
		<link>http://russ.garrett.co.uk/2009/03/12/datacenter-security-a-cautionary-tale/comment-page-1/#comment-476</link>
		<dc:creator>Security Theatre &#171; Hartley Security</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jun 2010 22:56:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://russ.garrett.co.uk/?p=43#comment-476</guid>
		<description>[...] factor (token, PIN and biometric) security system by breaking down a fire door and using a crowbar. [full story here] I am sure the customers at this data center felt very safe as they walked in through the front door [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] factor (token, PIN and biometric) security system by breaking down a fire door and using a crowbar. [full story here] I am sure the customers at this data center felt very safe as they walked in through the front door [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Now in the Playground: Scrobbling Timelines &#124; Social Trend Life</title>
		<link>http://russ.garrett.co.uk/2009/03/12/datacenter-security-a-cautionary-tale/comment-page-1/#comment-473</link>
		<dc:creator>Now in the Playground: Scrobbling Timelines &#124; Social Trend Life</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 May 2010 23:10:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://russ.garrett.co.uk/?p=43#comment-473</guid>
		<description>[...] hammered by millions of users every single day, and to complicate things even further they&#8217;re spread across three different datacentres. Since Laurie is currently our longest-serving sysadmin, he&#8217;s already shed substantial [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] hammered by millions of users every single day, and to complicate things even further they&#8217;re spread across three different datacentres. Since Laurie is currently our longest-serving sysadmin, he&#8217;s already shed substantial [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Legg</title>
		<link>http://russ.garrett.co.uk/2009/03/12/datacenter-security-a-cautionary-tale/comment-page-1/#comment-53</link>
		<dc:creator>James Legg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2009 19:20:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://russ.garrett.co.uk/?p=43#comment-53</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve heard stories of break-ins at the facility I work at, it&#039;s not a data center in the tradditional sense but we have a lot of expenive kit anway. At once point when we moved locations the police required that we only moved during daylight hours and that the truck had a police escort. These days we have large metal doors and all the windows have been covered in amour plating. It&#039;s is pretty worrying how organised (and well informed) computer thieves are.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve heard stories of break-ins at the facility I work at, it&#8217;s not a data center in the tradditional sense but we have a lot of expenive kit anway. At once point when we moved locations the police required that we only moved during daylight hours and that the truck had a police escort. These days we have large metal doors and all the windows have been covered in amour plating. It&#8217;s is pretty worrying how organised (and well informed) computer thieves are.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stuart</title>
		<link>http://russ.garrett.co.uk/2009/03/12/datacenter-security-a-cautionary-tale/comment-page-1/#comment-45</link>
		<dc:creator>stuart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 23:40:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://russ.garrett.co.uk/?p=43#comment-45</guid>
		<description>The datacenter where I work (not London but UK) could be susceptible to this type of robbery - and it&#039;s likely that this and other similar recent thefts have persuaded management to consider it a threat.

The plan - a milatary style defensive wall around the entire complex!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The datacenter where I work (not London but UK) could be susceptible to this type of robbery &#8211; and it&#8217;s likely that this and other similar recent thefts have persuaded management to consider it a threat.</p>
<p>The plan &#8211; a milatary style defensive wall around the entire complex!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gnarg</title>
		<link>http://russ.garrett.co.uk/2009/03/12/datacenter-security-a-cautionary-tale/comment-page-1/#comment-43</link>
		<dc:creator>gnarg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 22:46:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://russ.garrett.co.uk/?p=43#comment-43</guid>
		<description>Cisco 65xx = ridiculously expensive switches, or very expensive routers w/fancy extra functions. Yes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cisco 65xx = ridiculously expensive switches, or very expensive routers w/fancy extra functions. Yes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Network Security Blog &#187; Your datacenter may not be secure enough</title>
		<link>http://russ.garrett.co.uk/2009/03/12/datacenter-security-a-cautionary-tale/comment-page-1/#comment-35</link>
		<dc:creator>Network Security Blog &#187; Your datacenter may not be secure enough</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 15:12:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://russ.garrett.co.uk/?p=43#comment-35</guid>
		<description>[...] Just imagine it: your web site is down, you can&#8217;t reach the server, you can&#8217;t reach the router, the guys at the datacenter aren&#8217;t answering the phone, what the heck is going on?&#160; You get in your car and drive down to the datacenter and as you drive up you notice all the police cars in the parking lot.&#160; Walking into your datacenter, you learn that thieves have broken in over night and made off with you&#8217;re hardware as well as that of half a dozen companies in the same datacenter.&#160; Sound too ridiculous to be true?&#160; Last.FM found out last week that steel doors aren&#8217;t enough to keep determined criminals from breaking into your datacenter. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Just imagine it: your web site is down, you can&#8217;t reach the server, you can&#8217;t reach the router, the guys at the datacenter aren&#8217;t answering the phone, what the heck is going on?&nbsp; You get in your car and drive down to the datacenter and as you drive up you notice all the police cars in the parking lot.&nbsp; Walking into your datacenter, you learn that thieves have broken in over night and made off with you&#8217;re hardware as well as that of half a dozen companies in the same datacenter.&nbsp; Sound too ridiculous to be true?&nbsp; Last.FM found out last week that steel doors aren&#8217;t enough to keep determined criminals from breaking into your datacenter. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Russ</title>
		<link>http://russ.garrett.co.uk/2009/03/12/datacenter-security-a-cautionary-tale/comment-page-1/#comment-31</link>
		<dc:creator>Russ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 09:52:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://russ.garrett.co.uk/?p=43#comment-31</guid>
		<description>@A Lol Cat: (Sorry, you got caught in my spam queue) 

On the whole, the &quot;extra-secure&quot; datacenters in the UK don&#039;t have the power available for our needs. They also charge an extortionate markup. If we paid for a year&#039;s worth of our hosting there I think it might end up cheaper to get all of our kit stolen ;).

I know we share several of our datacenters with major banks. On the whole, the security provisions of the major London facilities are pretty similar.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@A Lol Cat: (Sorry, you got caught in my spam queue) </p>
<p>On the whole, the &#8220;extra-secure&#8221; datacenters in the UK don&#8217;t have the power available for our needs. They also charge an extortionate markup. If we paid for a year&#8217;s worth of our hosting there I think it might end up cheaper to get all of our kit stolen ;).</p>
<p>I know we share several of our datacenters with major banks. On the whole, the security provisions of the major London facilities are pretty similar.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Russ</title>
		<link>http://russ.garrett.co.uk/2009/03/12/datacenter-security-a-cautionary-tale/comment-page-1/#comment-30</link>
		<dc:creator>Russ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 09:07:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://russ.garrett.co.uk/?p=43#comment-30</guid>
		<description>@heri: We were a bit surprised, as the fire door they managed to break down was pretty solid.

@Anon: They do have 24/7 security, but it usually consists of one or two guys. It took them a short while to notice the alarm and respond. (Alarms for all Level3 sites are monitored centrally from their NOC in the US)

@muriithi: As Jon says, you can basically operate them as a slightly cheaper version of the 7600, although &quot;cheap&quot; is very relative...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@heri: We were a bit surprised, as the fire door they managed to break down was pretty solid.</p>
<p>@Anon: They do have 24/7 security, but it usually consists of one or two guys. It took them a short while to notice the alarm and respond. (Alarms for all Level3 sites are monitored centrally from their NOC in the US)</p>
<p>@muriithi: As Jon says, you can basically operate them as a slightly cheaper version of the 7600, although &#8220;cheap&#8221; is very relative&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon</title>
		<link>http://russ.garrett.co.uk/2009/03/12/datacenter-security-a-cautionary-tale/comment-page-1/#comment-29</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 06:04:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://russ.garrett.co.uk/?p=43#comment-29</guid>
		<description>muriithi: These days you can run a Cat6500 in native IOS mode and do all the routing you need so long as you don&#039;t need non-ethernet line cards or service provider features 
(that stuff is restricted to the 7600. Same chassis just licensed and branded as a router).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>muriithi: These days you can run a Cat6500 in native IOS mode and do all the routing you need so long as you don&#8217;t need non-ethernet line cards or service provider features<br />
(that stuff is restricted to the 7600. Same chassis just licensed and branded as a router).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: muriithi</title>
		<link>http://russ.garrett.co.uk/2009/03/12/datacenter-security-a-cautionary-tale/comment-page-1/#comment-27</link>
		<dc:creator>muriithi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 03:37:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://russ.garrett.co.uk/?p=43#comment-27</guid>
		<description>I thought Cisco 6500 series were switches not routers? I believe they can also do layer 3 in hybrid mode.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought Cisco 6500 series were switches not routers? I believe they can also do layer 3 in hybrid mode.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
